GlossaryGlossar Capital Architecture · canonical termsCapital Architecture · kanonische Begriffe

The named instruments. Defined here.

Die benannten Instrumente. Hier definiert.

Six canonical definitions for the discipline of Capital Architecture. Each term names a move that practitioners do regardless. The naming makes them transferable.

Sechs kanonische Definitionen für die Disziplin der Capital Architecture. Jeder Begriff benennt eine Bewegung, die Praktiker:innen ohnehin ausführen. Die Benennung macht sie übertragbar.

CACapital ArchitectureCapital Architecture

The discipline of structuring capital where market templates do not yet exist. Vehicles, mandates, collateral frames, waterfall mechanics and co-investment architectures, designed for problems the market has not yet learned to finance. Sits next to — not within — impact finance, blended finance and generalist advisory. Its own discipline, with its own coined methodology.

Example: a thirty-year placemaking real-asset structure cannot use a closed-end fund template; the architecture is the vehicle logic that allows pension capital, family-office capital and DFI capital to co-exist in one structure across thirty years.

Not to be confused with: impact finance (which commits to outcomes), blended finance (which stacks return classes), or generalist advisory (which selects from existing vehicles). Capital Architecture is upstream of all three.

Read further: the discipline page · essay · Structure precedes capital

Die Disziplin der Kapitalstrukturierung, wo Marktvorlagen noch nicht existieren. Vehikel, Mandate, Sicherheitenrahmen, Waterfall-Mechanik und Co-Investment-Architekturen für Probleme, die der Markt noch nicht zu finanzieren gelernt hat. Steht neben — nicht in — Impact Finance, Blended Finance und generalistischer Beratung. Eine eigene Disziplin mit eigener Methodik.

Weiterlesen: die Disziplin-Seite

CCFCreative Capital FormationCreative Capital Formation

The active practice of Capital Architecture. Architecture is the noun — what shape the structure takes. Creative capital formation is the verb — how the structure actually gets assembled, closed, and held together over years. The two terms describe the same discipline from different angles.

Example: a sovereignty-driven energy mandate that ends as an evergreen Liechtenstein vehicle with a 10-year secondary-liquidity option, AIFM-partnered out of Lux. The vehicle is the architecture; the assembly is the formation.

Not to be confused with: standard capital formation (IPO desks, syndicated loans, closed-end funds for known shapes). The adjective — creative — is the load-bearing one.

Read further: the active-practice section

Die aktive Praxis von Capital Architecture. Architektur ist das Substantiv — welche Form die Struktur annimmt. Creative Capital Formation ist das Verb — wie die Struktur tatsächlich zusammengefügt, geschlossen und über Jahre gehalten wird.

MCMandate CartographyMandate Cartography

The systematic mapping of an allocator's mandate against the structure of a candidate opportunity, before instruments are named. Each plausible allocator is recorded against four operative questions: policy boundary, risk-grid cell, liability profile, decision authority and cadence. Twenty cells, four columns, one page. The map determines the shape of share classes, hurdles, lock-ups, jurisdiction and AIFM partner.

Example: ten plausible LPs map onto three structural clusters — DFI anchor needing concessional first-loss, commercial-pension cohort needing senior fixed income, family-office cluster wanting equity upside. Three share classes. The vehicle is a function of the map.

Not to be confused with: a target list of LPs. The target list answers who do I know; the map answers what is the shape of the structure that lands.

Read further: essay · Mandate Cartography

Die systematische Kartierung des Mandats eines Allokators gegen die Struktur einer Opportunität, bevor Instrumente benannt sind. Vier operative Fragen: Policy-Boundary, Risk-Grid-Zelle, Liability-Profil, Entscheidungsautorität und Kadenz. Die Karte ist die Struktur.

MMMobilisation MultiplierMobilisation Multiplier

The ratio of commercial capital deployed at financial close to concessional capital committed. Computed at close, not at intent. Uses commercial capital actually deployed, not committed-subject-to-conditions. Counts only concessional capital that bears first loss or equivalent.

Example: a 16% concessional first-loss layer mobilising 84% senior commercial = 5.25x. Real-world median across published blended-finance structures sits around 2.5x (Convergence Finance data). Above 5x = engineered. Below 1.5x = subsidised commercial finance with a different cover page.

Not to be confused with: announced or structured leverage. The Multiplier is realised, audited at close.

Read further: essay · Minimum Concessionality · methodology section

Das Verhältnis von kommerziellem Kapital, das bei Financial Close eingesetzt wird, zu konzessionärem Kapital, das gebunden wurde. Berechnet beim Close, nicht bei Intent.

MnCMinimum ConcessionalityMinimum Concessionality

The discipline of using the smallest layer of concessional capital required to make a structure investable. Three operative tests: necessity (would commercial capital move without it?), sizing (what is the smallest layer that crosses the threshold?), and form (first-loss, guarantee, subordinated debt, hedge subsidy, TA grant). The readout is the Mobilisation Multiplier.

Example: a DFI offered up to 30% first-loss on a peatland-credit vehicle; allocator dialogue showed senior commercial would clear at 12% with the right collateral structure. Taking 12% produced 7.4x mobilisation. Taking 30% would have produced 2.3x. The discipline is the optimisation.

Not to be confused with: minimal blending, or rejecting concessional capital. The discipline is finding the threshold, not avoiding it.

Read further: essay · Minimum Concessionality

Die Disziplin, die kleinste Schicht konzessionären Kapitals einzusetzen, die nötig ist, um eine Struktur investierbar zu machen. Drei Tests: Notwendigkeit, Sizing, Form.

MRAMandate Readiness AssessmentMandate Readiness Assessment

A diagnostic that surfaces whether an allocator's mandate, governance and instrument architecture are aligned for a given thesis — before a vehicle is launched. Run by the allocator, on themselves. Four parts: mandate boundaries, governance cadence, instrument architecture, decision authority.

Example: a pension fund had board-approved thematic mandate, IC-approved budget, manager identified. Diagnostic surfaced: governance cadence wrong (quarterly IC for a structure needing monthly decisioning), custodian could not carry the proposed tokenised wrapper, decision authority unclear due to recent CIO transition. Three of four broken. The structure was fine; the mandate wasn't ready.

Not to be confused with: due diligence on a manager. MRA is run by the allocator on themselves, not on counterparties.

Read further: methodology section · the discipline page

Eine Diagnose, die offenlegt, ob das Mandat, die Governance und die Instrumentenarchitektur eines Allokators für eine gegebene These ausgerichtet sind — bevor ein Vehikel aufgesetzt wird.